翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ WRQK-FM
・ WRQN
・ WRQQ
・ WRQR
・ WRQR (AM)
・ WRQT
・ WRQX
・ WRQY
・ WRR
・ WRR (FM)
・ Wrongful abortion
・ Wrongful birth
・ Wrongful conviction of Steve Titus
・ Wrongful death claim
・ Wrongful dismissal
Wrongful dismissal in the United Kingdom
・ Wrongful execution
・ Wrongful imprisonment of Victor Nealon
・ Wrongful life
・ Wrongful trading
・ Wrongfully Accused
・ Wrongs Darker Than Death or Night
・ Wroniawy, Greater Poland Voivodeship
・ Wroniawy, Łódź Voivodeship
・ Wronie
・ Wronie Gniazdo
・ Wronie Góry
・ Wroniec
・ Wroniec (book)
・ Wroniec, Lesser Poland Voivodeship


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Wrongful dismissal in the United Kingdom : ウィキペディア英語版
Wrongful dismissal in the United Kingdom
In United Kingdom law, the concept of wrongful dismissal refers exclusively to dismissal contrary to the contract of employment, which effectively means premature termination, either due to insufficient notice or lack of grounds. Although wrongful dismissal is usually associated with lack of notice sometimes it can also be caused by arbitrary dismissal where no notice was required but certain grounds were specified in the contract as being the only ones available but none existed.
== Definitions ==
Wrongful dismissal does not terminate the contract - it is a repudiatory breach, i.e. one entitling the employee to consider himself no longer bound on the basis of the employer no longer considering itself bound. The employer's repudiatory breach (wrongful dismissal) forces the employee to accept it as he is prevented from earning from the employer and required to mitigate by working for someone else, thus terminating the contract.〔Boyo v Lambeth London Borough Council () ICR 727〕 This does not follow contract law and is an invention by judges, disliked by others, designed to reflect the reality of employment, using the dual fictions that because the right to wages depends on the obligation to work, there is no right to wages if the employer tells the employee not to work〔Gunton v Richmond upon Thames LBC () ICR 755〕 (forgetting that the employer is not able to terminate the obligation to work other than in accordance with the contract) and that the employee has accepted the repudiation by not working for the employer even though he is willing and able. Otherwise the employee would be entitled to stay at home at the employer's request yet sue for unpaid wages as a debt.
An employer is only entitled to dismiss an employee without notice:
* in the first month,
* if the contract says so, or
* if the employee conducts himself so as to undermine the trust and confidence such that the employer should no longer be required to retain the employee in his employment.
The last example, trust and confidence, is commonly known as "gross misconduct", but employment law only distinguishes between misconduct that justifies dismissal and misconduct that does not. Conduct entitling the employer to terminate the contract is conduct indicating the employee no longer considers himself bound by it and so is technically accepting the termination caused by the employee. Gross misconduct is really just a vague list of offences that could most easily justify summary dismissal for a first offence.
An employee could seriously annoy an employer without indicating that he no longer intends to be bound by the contract.
Dismissal for a reason contrary to statute or contrary to a statutory procedure is described as "unfair dismissal" but not all wrongful dismissals are unfair dismissals, and dismissal by forcing somebody to resign through serious breach of contract is known as constructive dismissal and constructive dismissal is usually a wrongful dismissal due to lack of notice.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Wrongful dismissal in the United Kingdom」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.